On the Knife Edge: How Germany Lost the First World War

On the Knife Edge: How Germany Lost the First World War

  • Downloads:5410
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2022-10-04 09:19:39
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Holger Afflerbach
  • ISBN:1108832881
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Was the outcome of the First World War on a knife edge? In this major new account of German wartime politics and strategy Holger Afflerbach argues that the outcome of the war was actually in the balance until relatively late in the war。 Using new evidence from diaries, letters and memoirs, he fundamentally revises our understanding of German strategy from the decision to go to war and the failure of the western offensive to the radicalisation of Germany's war effort under Hindenburg and Ludendorff and the ultimate collapse of the Central Powers。 He uncovers the struggles in wartime Germany between supporters of peace and hardliners who wanted to fight to the finish。 He suggests that Germany was not nearly as committed to all-out conquest as previous accounts argue。 Numerous German peace advances could have offered the opportunity to end the war before it dragged Europe into the abyss。

Download

Reviews

spencer wright

A book that sets out to try and answer, like many books before, how Germany lost World War I。 The title itself sets up the focus on Germany, but the Central Powers played a role too。 Overall, a good book, that attempts to shake up current scholarly views。

William Harris

I have just finished my read of "On a Knife Edge: How Germany Lost the First World War," by Holger Afflerbach。 It was made available to me in the form of an ARC by Cambridge University Press, and I am very grateful to them。 This text examines specifically the commitment of the German High Command and the various political constituencies in the Second Reich to "winning" the war。 In the course of accomplishing this, the author examines both how "victory" might have been conceptualized by the very I have just finished my read of "On a Knife Edge: How Germany Lost the First World War," by Holger Afflerbach。 It was made available to me in the form of an ARC by Cambridge University Press, and I am very grateful to them。 This text examines specifically the commitment of the German High Command and the various political constituencies in the Second Reich to "winning" the war。 In the course of accomplishing this, the author examines both how "victory" might have been conceptualized by the very different constituencies in play as well as the very different views of those who were simply searching for a way to end the catastrophe of World War on somewhat equitable terms。 Note how different this picture of a very divided Reich on the subject of winning the war and what costs might have to be paid is from the more accepted view of Germany stubbornly insisting on an all or nothing approach to the question of victory or a negotiated settlement。 Therein lies the principle contribution of this work to studies of World War I。 Not simply (or even primarily) a military history, this text embraces a much more holistic approach to examining the complex interplay of political and social forces that played out behind the scenes of the great military campaigns。 While the author's interest is primarily focused on events relating directly to the Kaiser's Reich, it is obvious that these can only be understood in the broader context of European politics at the time。 Well written and often startling in its analysis, this book should be a must read for anyone attempting to come to terms with the cataclysmic events of the Great War。 Just to make one point that struck me as I was reading the author's analysis; it is fascinating how war and the horrors it encompassed came to dominate the discussions of alternative endings instead of traditional victory。 I was put in mind of those who look at a conflict like Vietnam or Afghanistan and become increasingly trapped by the resources (in both blood and treasure) which they have already expended。 This leads to a kind of straightjacket which comes to dominate discussions of withdrawal or war objectives, often leaving little resemblance to the more "logical" motives which had propelled things from the beginning。 In short, the violence takes on a life of its own hushing the voices of those who could see where things were going。 Read this book; the world of the Great War will look very different when you are finished。 。。。more